









































Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Important topics for exam purpose.
Typology: Exams
1 / 49
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Immovable properties
If a chattel, i.e., movable property is attached to earth or building, it is immovable property. Perumal naicker v/s Ramaswami Kone- A property is a movable property and for its beneficial use of enjoyment it is necessary to imbed it or fix it on earth, through permanently, that is , when it is in use it should not be regarded as immovable property for that reason. For example – sugar cane machine or oil engine. Recognized as Immovable properties-
When we analyze the above definition- there are few things which comes up regarding Transfer of property- Transfer is an ACT- Giving and Taking of Rights- Active Act, Visible Act. Between two or more LIVING PERSON- by which a living person Inter vivos- Living or Natural person and Artificial Person ( Law existence, company). Conveys- transfer. Present or future- Future property not allowed. Property- Property to another person- To himself ( Trust, minor or guardianship- Rahubar Singh v/s Jai Jnder Bhadur Singh. Transfer of Property Act Practice Insolvent Subject matter Mode of Transfer There are modes of transfer of property
Transfer of Property
Property- property may be tangible or intangible, property is essentially a bundle of rights or interest. When a property is transferred it actually the transfer of rights. All rights in a property denote the ownership or absolute interest. in Sunil Sidhartbai v/s Commissioner of Income tax, SC held that in general transfer of property transferred the bundle of right but in some case it may only be partial of right transfer also happen example – Lease. In Jugalkishore V/ Ram Cotton Co. Ltd. SC held- the world PRESENT OR IN FUTURE’ qualify the word conveys and not the word property. When a future property is transferred the transferee does not get that property or interest there in. To another living person. There should be another person to whom the property can be transfer, a person can not transfer the property to himself, but in 1929 some amendment has been made and a person can transfer a property to himself in case he make any settlement in a trust and he become the sole trustee. Other Rules- Not a Transfer of Property Family Settlement- Family settlement or Family agreement is not a transfer of property, why because when it take place the already existing shares of the members of the family are defined and separated in order to avoid any possible dispute. In Sadu Madho Das V/s Pandit Mukund Ram, SC observed the same principle. Transfer of property Release- It is a transfer of property, because when larger interest falls into smallest interest every small interest generate a title for some one or new person. This Act also applicable on MOVABLE AND IMMOVABLE PROPERTYS ( Part A –Chapter II).
Section - General Rule- Every thing Can be Transfer Exception- Prohibited by S.TPA, any other law in force.
Section .6 – Non Transferable.
Section-10- Condition restraining alienation- Void the Condition not the Transfer. Where property is transferred subject to a condition or limitation ABSOLUTELY RESTRAINING the transferee or any person claiming under him form parting with or disposing of his interest in the property, the condition or limitation is void, except in the case of lease where the condition is for the benefit of the lessor or those claiming under him. Provided that property may be transferred to or for the benefit of a women (not being a Hindu, Muhammadan or Buddhist), so that she shall not have power during her marriage to transfer or charge the same or her beneficial interest therein. Conditional Transfer Absolute restraint Partial restraint Restaint on alienation in compromises Applicability of S. Exception
Partial restraint is valid and enforceable- Muhammad Raza V Abbas Bandi Bibi- condition restraint the transfer outside the family. S10 applies only when there is absolute transfer of ownership like Sale, Gift, Actionable Claim I t does not applies on Mortgage or Lease. Compromise- is outside the preview of S5 Transfer of property so S10 does not apply on Compromise. Mata Prasad V Nageshar Sahai- Dispute over succeeding the properties of the deceased between his widow and nephew. It was compromise between them that widow shall hold the possession of the property for her life while admitting the title of the nephew but nephew was restrained from transferring the property during the life of the widow. Same in Laxmama V State of Karnataka- Held – Grant by Govt is not fall within the meaning of S5 so it can be restraint. Exception- Lease- It applies to permanent or temporary lease. Married woman- to safeguard the right of married women. Section 11- Restriction repugnant to interest created- Section 11 r/w S Crux- Right to use in a particular Manner- is void. Exception-
No transfer can be made directly to an unborn person. Such transfer can be made by the machinery of trust. Reason behind if a transfer were made directly to an unborn person, there would be an abeyance of ownership form the date of transfer till the coming into existence of the unborn person which is void according to English Common Law. PRIOR INTEREST In case the trust is not created , the estate must vest in some person between the date of the transfer and the coming into existence of the unborn person. In other words, the interest in favour of an unborn person must always be preceded by a prior interest in favour of a living person. Illustrations I. A transfer his house to X for life and thereafter to UB (unborn) who is an unborn son of A. The transfer of house in favour of UB is valid, here since UB is not in existence at the date of the transfer, A could not transfer the houser directly to him. So, A had to make a direct transfer of life interest in favour of X who is a living person at the date of the transfer. After the death of X the interest of the house shall pass on to UB who is the ultimate beneficiary. ABSOLUTE INTEREST The entire property must be transferred to the unborn person. It is not permissible to confer a life-interest on an unborn person. in English Law it is possible to give an estate to an unborn person for life. But this aspect of Enlish Law was subject ot a restriction called the rule against double possibilities. Illustration I. A transfer his property to X for his life and thereafter to UB for life X is a living person at the date of the transfer. UB is not into existence at the date of transfer so the transfer of life interest of X is valid. But the transfer of life interest of UB is void because although the transfer in favour of UB is preceded by a life interest to X but UB himself has not been given an absolute interest. The result is, therefore that X shall hold the property during his life but after his death it shall not pass on the UB but shall revert back to A or ( if A is dead that time) to A’s legal heirs. Reason- giving life interest or creating life estate in favour of a person means giving him only the RIGHT OF ENJOYMENT AND POSSESSION. HE HAS TO PRESERVE THE PROPERTY LIKE A TURSTEE DURING HIS LIFE TIME ON BEHALF OF UNBORN.
Held that the gift in favour of unborn daughter was invalid u/s 13 because the gift was of limited interest and subject to prior interest in favour of B.