











Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Schachter's Two-Factor Theory of Emotion explains how we decide what emotion we are experiencing based on physiological arousal and environmental cues. This theory suggests that we first experience physiological arousal and then try to find a label for our feelings by observing our behavior and the environment. Two examples and research studies are provided to illustrate this theory.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 19
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
This theory is similar to Bem’s explanation for the cause of behavior in general. Schachter’s theory looks specifically at how we decide what emotion we are experiencing – when we are experiencing one.
We then try to find a label to explain our feelings, usually by looking at what we are doing (behavior) and what else is happening at the time of the arousal (environment).
Thus we don’t just feel angry, happy or whatever: we experience general feeling and then decide what they mean, a specific emotion.
Physiological arousal (up or down) occurs
+ Environmental circumstances = Attributed emotion
I am tense and sweating +
Sorority Sue is looking at me and smiling
= I am in love
Note in these two examples, the state of arousal that the person is experiencing is the same. What changes is the environment.
Two-factor theory argues that the cues in the environment are what determine the emotion that we believe we are experiencing.
Would this work for severely depressed people? No
But, for minor ups and downs, there is something to the argument.
Schachter and Singer (1962) gave some people a mild stimulant and others a placebo (on a pretence of testing vitamins). They then gave them a questionnaire containing rather personal questions. Another person in the room got angry at the questionnaire. The people who had been given the stimulant (and thus felt aroused) reported that they felt angry themselves.
Dutton and Aron (1974) had an attractive woman ask for interviews of young men. Some were interviewed on a swaying rope bridge, 200 ft above a river. Others were interviewed on level ground. A part way through the interview, she gives them her phone number. Over 60 % from the rope bridge called her. Only 30% interviewed on ground called her.
Explanation: Bridge Interviewees
Arousal +
Attractive woman gave me her phone number
= Emotion: I must like her (I’m turned on). I’ll call
Two-factor theory says that the emotion that we feel that we are experiencing when we are aroused is determined by factors present in our environment. The environmental factors determine the emotion that we believe we are experiencing.
How do we know what emotion to attach to an experience? This must be learned.
I am a child watching a high wire act in a circus and I am aroused + Dad tells me that this is really exciting to him = The arousal I am experiencing must be excitement