Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Trace Element Models: Melting, Crystallization and Magma Mixing in Geochemistry - Prof. Na, Assignments of Geology

Instructions for problem set two in the geochemistry course, geol 567. Students are required to calculate trace element compositions of partial melts of mantle lherzolite using a non-modal batch melting model, and plot the results on various diagrams. They also need to calculate concentrations of ni, ba, rb, and sr during fractional crystallization of basalt, and compare fractional crystallization and magma mixing models for the evolution of a suite of lavas. Tables with initial concentrations and partition coefficients, and data for problem 3.

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/09/2009

koofers-user-7im
koofers-user-7im 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
GEOL 567 Name___________________________________
Global Geochemical Systems
Problem Set Two
Trace Element Models: Melting and Crystallization
50 points
Due 2 March 05
Part One: Mantle Melting
Using the bulk composition, eutectic composition, initial concentrations of Ni, Rb, Ba,
and Sr, and partition coefficients in Tables 1 and 2, calculate the trace element compositions of
partial melts of mantle lherzolite. Use a non-modal batch melting model for F values from 0 to
1 in increments of 0.1. You can do this with a calculator or a spreadsheet.
Plot the results on the following diagrams:
f vs. CL/Co for all four elements
Ba and Sr vs. Rb
Ba/Rb, Ba/Sr ratios vs. the differentiation index of your choice
(F, Ni, Rb...)
Write an abstract summarizing the results (incompatible element enrichments and
compatible element depletions, relative enrichments as a function of partition coefficient,
element ratios that are useful to describe partial melting relations, .......)
Part Two: Fractional Crystallization of Basalt
Choose one partial melt (basalt) calculated in Part One. Calculate the concentrations of
Ni, Ba, Rb, and Sr during fractional crystallization consistent with a 2:1 plagioclase/olivine
phenocryst assemblage (67% plag and 33% ol), using the partition coefficients in Table 2.
Plot the results on the following diagrams:
F vs. CL/Co for all four elements
Ba and Sr vs. Rb
Ba/Rb, Ba/Sr ratios vs. the differentiation index of your choice
(F, Ni, Rb...)
Write an abstract summarizing the results, similar to your abstract for Part One.
Compare the behavior of Sr in the melting model of Part One to the crystallization model of Part
Two. Why did the behavior of Sr change?
Part Three: Application: Fractional Crystallization or Magma Mixing??
REE data for Taos Plateau basalts, andesites, and a dacite exposed in the Red River
Gorge near Questa, NM are reproduced in Table 3 (McMillan and Dungan, 1986, JGR, 91:6029-
6045). Plot these data on a chondrite-normalized REE diagram.
Calculate and compare models of fractional crystallization and magma mixing for the
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Trace Element Models: Melting, Crystallization and Magma Mixing in Geochemistry - Prof. Na and more Assignments Geology in PDF only on Docsity!

GEOL 567 Name___________________________________ Global Geochemical Systems Problem Set Two Trace Element Models: Melting and Crystallization 50 points Due 2 March 05 Part One: Mantle Melting Using the bulk composition, eutectic composition, initial concentrations of Ni, Rb, Ba, and Sr, and partition coefficients in Tables 1 and 2, calculate the trace element compositions of partial melts of mantle lherzolite. Use a non-modal batch melting model for F values from 0 to 1 in increments of 0.1. You can do this with a calculator or a spreadsheet. Plot the results on the following diagrams: f vs. CL/Co for all four elements Ba and Sr vs. Rb Ba/Rb, Ba/Sr ratios vs. the differentiation index of your choice (F, Ni, Rb...) Write an abstract summarizing the results (incompatible element enrichments and compatible element depletions, relative enrichments as a function of partition coefficient, element ratios that are useful to describe partial melting relations, .......) Part Two: Fractional Crystallization of Basalt Choose one partial melt (basalt) calculated in Part One. Calculate the concentrations of Ni, Ba, Rb, and Sr during fractional crystallization consistent with a 2:1 plagioclase/olivine phenocryst assemblage (67% plag and 33% ol), using the partition coefficients in Table 2. Plot the results on the following diagrams: F vs. CL/Co for all four elements Ba and Sr vs. Rb Ba/Rb, Ba/Sr ratios vs. the differentiation index of your choice (F, Ni, Rb...) Write an abstract summarizing the results, similar to your abstract for Part One. Compare the behavior of Sr in the melting model of Part One to the crystallization model of Part Two. Why did the behavior of Sr change? Part Three: Application: Fractional Crystallization or Magma Mixing?? REE data for Taos Plateau basalts, andesites, and a dacite exposed in the Red River Gorge near Questa, NM are reproduced in Table 3 (McMillan and Dungan, 1986, JGR, 91:6029- 6045). Plot these data on a chondrite-normalized REE diagram. Calculate and compare models of fractional crystallization and magma mixing for the

evolution of this suite of lavas, assuming that basalt RG-197 is the parent magma. Partition coefficients and phenocryst assemblages are included in Table 3. For mixing, assume that dacite RG-206 was the silicic component. Plot the results of both models on REE diagrams and write an abstract interpreting the results. TABLE 1. Bulk (point X) and eutectic (point Y) modal compositions for lherzolite melting used in problem 1 (from Wilson, 1989). Modal Aug Modal Opx Modal Ol Eutectic (P values) 0.68 0.22 0. Bulk (X values) 0.25 0.20 0. TABLE 2. Initial concentrations (problem 1) and partition coefficients (problems 1-2). Initial Element Concentration Dol^ Dopx^ Daug^ Dpl Ni 2000 10.0 4.0 2.0 0. Ba 100 0.001 0.001 0.001 0. Rb 5 0.001 0.001 0.001 0. Sr 100 0.001 0.010 0.070 2.

Problem Set Two Trace Element Models: Melting Crystallization, and Mixing Evaluation Criteria Part One: Partial melting of lherzolite Technical content of the abstract ____Trace element composition of the required partial melts are correctly calculated. (2) ____The required diagrams (total of 8) are presented. (2) ____Writer describes the behavior of trace elements during melting as a function of partition coefficient. (2) _____Writer discusses the variation in trace element ratios during partial melting, and why certain ratios are diagnostic for melting processes. (2) Writing ____Writer supports interpretations using data and diagrams. (2) ____Interpretations reflect clarity of thought and depth of analysis. (3) ____Standard edited English is used effectively. (1) Part Two: Fractional crystallization of basaltic magma Technical content of the abstract ____Trace element composition of the required fractionated melts are correctly calculated (2) ____The required diagrams (total of 8) are presented. (2) ____Writer discusses the behavior of trace elements during fractional crystallization as a function of partition coefficient. (2) ____Writer discusses the variation in trace element ratios during fractional crystallization, and why certain ratios are diagnostic for the crystallization process. ____Writer compares the behavior of Sr in Part One and Part Two. (2) Writing ____Writer supports interpretations using data and diagrams. (2) ____Interpretations reflect clarity of thought and depth of analysis. (3) ____Standard edited English is used effectively. (1) Part Three: Magma mixing and Rare Earth Elements Technical content of the abstract ____REE data of the Red River lavas are presented in a standard REE diagram. (2) ____REE concentrations in mixed magmas are calculated. (2) ____REE concentrations in mixed magmas are presented in a standard REE diagram. (2) ____REE concentrations in magmas produced by fractional crystallization of olivine from RG- 197 are presented. (2) ____Writer discusses the differences in REE distribution for mixing and fractional crystallization models. (4) Writing ____Writer supports interpretations using data and diagrams. (2) ____Interpretations reflect clarity of thought and depth of analysis. (3) ____Standard edited English is used effectively. (1)