Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Uses and Gratification of Online Advertising, Lecture notes of Mass Communication

Uses and gratification theory in history, purpose, assumption and model of uses and gratification theory and explain the interaetive nature of CMC and online advertising.

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

dyanabel
dyanabel 🇺🇸

4.7

(20)

288 documents

1 / 207

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften
Institute für Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft
Fachgebiet Kommunikationswissenschaft
USES AND GRATIFICATIONS OF ONLINE
ADVERTISING
A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN GERMANY AND EGYPT
A dissertation submitted to the technical university of Ilmenau (Germany) for the
degree of Doctor of philosophy (PhD) in mass communication
Presented by
Abd El-Basit Ahmed Hashem Mahmoud Abdullah Shaheen (M.A.)
The examination committee members
Prof. Dr. Paul Klimsa (Technical University Ilmenau, Germany)
Prof. Dr. Philip Auter (University of Louisiana, USA)
Jun. Prof. Dr. Jeffery Wimmer (Technical University Ilmenau, Germany)
Submitted May 18, 2010
urn:nbn:de:gbv:ilm1-2010000327
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39
pf3a
pf3b
pf3c
pf3d
pf3e
pf3f
pf40
pf41
pf42
pf43
pf44
pf45
pf46
pf47
pf48
pf49
pf4a
pf4b
pf4c
pf4d
pf4e
pf4f
pf50
pf51
pf52
pf53
pf54
pf55
pf56
pf57
pf58
pf59
pf5a
pf5b
pf5c
pf5d
pf5e
pf5f
pf60
pf61
pf62
pf63
pf64

Partial preview of the text

Download Uses and Gratification of Online Advertising and more Lecture notes Mass Communication in PDF only on Docsity!

Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften

Institute für Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft

Fachgebiet Kommunikationswissenschaft

USES AND GRATIFICATIONS OF ONLINE

ADVERTISING

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN GERMANY AND EGYPT

A dissertation submitted to the technical university of Ilmenau (Germany) for the

degree of Doctor of philosophy (PhD) in mass communication

Presented by

Abd El-Basit Ahmed Hashem Mahmoud Abdullah Shaheen (M.A.)

The examination committee members

Prof. Dr. Paul Klimsa (Technical University Ilmenau, Germany)

Prof. Dr. Philip Auter (University of Louisiana, USA)

Jun. Prof. Dr. Jeffery Wimmer (Technical University Ilmenau, Germany)

Submitted May 18, 2010

urn:nbn:de:gbv:ilm1-

V

Dedication

To my daughter/ Fatema Al – Zahraa Shaheen.

To my father/Sheikh Ahmed Hashem Mahmoud Abdullah Shaheen who passed away during my work in this dissertation, may Allah bless him and forgive all his sins.

To my friend/ Sheikh Montaser Mahmoud Alrabab who passed away during my work in this dissertation, may Allah bless him and forgive all his sins.

To my uncles who passed away during my work in this dissertation:

  • Mr. Abd Elkareem Saadeek Shaheen
  • Mr. Adel Elwardani Shaheen
  • Mr. Ahmed Elwardani Shaheen
  • Mr. Kamal Eldeen Hamdoon Kenawi
  • Mr. Nashat Kenawi

May Allah bless all of them and forgive all their sins.

To the soul of my mother and the soul of my grandmother, may

Allah bless them and forgive all their sins.

VII

Acknowledgement

My greatest debt of gratitude goes to my supervisor, Prof. Paul Klimsa, whose

insightful comments, scholarly guidance and cooperation encouraged and saw me through this

project. He was always patient and read every draft of the project.

Greatest thanks go to all my respondents for sparing their precious time, for being

cooperative and giving appropriate responses.

Special thanks go to my colleagues; Gunther Kreuzberger, Anja Beyer and Marion

Irmer, whose assistance made my academic life comfortable during my studies at technical

university of Ilmenau.

While it is not possible to give acknowledgements to all those who assisted me, I have

to give special thanks to my family and my friends whose prayers and moral support enabled

me to successfully pursue my study.

However, all errors and omissions, views and interpretations remain mine and should

not be attributed to any one of the above mentioned persons.

spent on these sites, and finally there is a significant difference between Egyptian and German

consumer’s attitudes toward using commercial websites.

Findings of content analysis study found that the websites that were visited by German

users used the basic and contact information more than did the sites that were visited by

Egyptian users. The study found that the websites that were visited by German users used

interactive features and offered ads more than did the sites that were visited by Egyptian

users.

XI

Zusammenfassung

Diese Studie versucht die Motive, Haltungen und erhaltenen Gratifikationen aus

kommerziellen Webseiten als wichtigstes Format der Online-Werbung darzustellen und die

Beziehungen zwischen diesen Elementen zu untersuchen. Es wurde eine Online-Umfrage mit

deutschen und ägyptischen Nutzern durchgeführt, die kommerziellen Webseiten besucht

haben. Insgesamt haben 648 Personen an der Befragung teilgenommen. Davon nahmen 352

an der deutschsprachigen und 296 an der arabischen Umfrage teil, um die Gründe für die

Nutzung kommerzieller Webseiten sowie die Gratifikationen, die sie aus dieser Nutzung

erhalten, zu erfahren. Es wurde vorab eine Content-Analyse der Webseiten durchgeführt, um

ein besseres Verständnis für die Natur des Inhalts zu gewinnen. Insgesamt wurden 248

kommerzielle Webseiten besucht, die von deutschen und ägyptischen Nutzern inhaltlich

analysiert wurden. Der Forscher betrachtete die Menge und Art der Werbung, die angezeigt

wurden, sowie Formate und Eigenschaften der Online Anzeigen als auch die Eigenschaften

der kommerziellen Webseiten als Ganzes.

Die Ergebnisse der Studie ergaben, dass die Befragten im Allgemeinen positive Erfahrungen

mit kommerziellen Webseiten gemacht haben. Die deutschen Befragten waren etwas positiver

gegenüber die Verwendung von Einkaufs-Dienstprogrammen der kommerziellen Webseiten

eingestellt als ägyptischen Nutzer. Zudem wird in dieser Studie ein theoretisches Modell zur

Beschreibung der Beziehungen zwischen den Elementen Uses und Gratifikationen (Motive,

Haltungen, Gewohnheiten und Gratifikationen) im Rahmen der Online-Werbung hinsichtlich

kommerzieller Webseiten präsentiert. Alle Hypothesen dieser Studie wurden bis auf die Erste

vollständig bestätigt, die nur teilweise bestätigt werden konnte. Die Inhaltanalyse ergab, dass

die grundlegenden Informationen und Kontaktinformationen der Webseiten von deutschen

Nutzern mehr verwendet werden als von ägyptischen Nutzern. Des Weiteren ergab die Studie,

dass die deutschen Nutzer mehr Webseiten mit interaktiven Features und angebotenen

Anzeigen besuchten als die ägyptischen Nutzer.

XIII

XVI

XVII

  • (1) INTRODUCTION Table of contents
  • 1.1 Statement of the problem..............................................................................................................
  • 1.2 Objectives of the study
  • 1.3 Prior studies on commercial websites
  • 1.4 Choice of Germany and Egypt
  • 1.5 Hypotheses and questions of the study
  • 1.6 Method
  • 1.7 Significance of the study
  • 1.8 The importance of content analysis for current study
  • 1.9 Thesis content
  • (2) THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
  • 2.1 Uses and gratifications theory
    • 2.1.1 Historical background
    • 2.1.2 Purposes of the theory
    • 2.1.3 Assumptions of theory...................................................................................................................
    • 2.1.4 Models of uses and gratifications theory
    • 2.1.5 Cultural differences in uses and gratifications...............................................................................
    • 2.1.6 The basic elements of uses and gratifications theory
    • 2.1.7 The perspective of uses and gratifications in Internet use
    • 2.1.8 Criticism of uses and gratifications theory
  • 2.2 Interactive nature of CMC
    • 2.2.1 The concept of interactivity
    • 2.2.2 Dimensions of interactivity
    • 2.2.3 Types of interactivity
    • 2.2.4 CMC as interactive communication
  • 2.3 Online advertising
    • 2.3.1 Concept of online advertising
    • 2.3.2 Birth and Development
    • 2.3.3 The differences between online advertising and other forms of advertising
    • 2.3.4 Functions of online ads..................................................................................................................
    • 2.3.5 Types of online advertisements
    • 2.3.6 Online advertising formats
    • 2.3.7 Features of online advertising
  • 2.4 Commercial websites XIV
    • 2.4.1 Concept of commercial websites
    • 2.4.2 Commercial websites as online advertising...................................................................................
    • 2.4.3 Birth and development
    • 2.4.4 Importance of commercial websites
    • 2.4.5 Types of commercial websites.......................................................................................................
    • 2.4.6 Constructions of commercial websites
    • 2.4.7 Problems of commercial websites
    • 2.4.8 The fact of online advertising and commercial sites in Germany and Egypt
  • (3) RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES
  • 3.1 Models of online advertising
    • 3.1.1 Davis’ model
    • 3.1.2 Pavlou & Stewart model................................................................................................................
    • 3.1.3 The interactive advertising model (IAM)
  • 3.2 The suggested uses and gratifications model of online advertising
    • 3.2.1 Motivations of commercial websites
    • 3.2.2 Attitudes toward commercial websites
    • 3.2.3 Obtained gratifications form using commercial websites..............................................................
    • 3.2.4 Time spent on using commercial websites
    • 3.2.5 Demographic and cultural characteristics of commercial websites users
  • 3.3 Research Questions and Hypotheses of current study
    • 3.3.1 Questions and hypotheses of survey study
    • I. The questions of survey study
    • II. Hypotheses of the survey study
    • 3.3.2 Questions of content analysis study
  • (4) METHODOLOGY
  • 4.1 Sample of study............................................................................................................................
  • 4.2 Procedures for collecting and analyzing data
  • 4.3 Measurements of uses and gratifications................................................................................... - Motives and gratifications measurement - Attitudes measurement - Usage measurement
  • 4.4 Data collection - Online Questionnaire - Content analysis
  • 4.5 Reliability of questionnaire measurements and content analysis
  • 6.2 Conclusion
  • 6.3 Recommendations
  • 6.4 Suggestions for further research
  • REFERENCES
  • APPENDIX
  • Appendix 1 (Online survey)
  • Appendix 2 (Content analysis)............................................................................................................ ...
  • Figure 5-11. Comparisons between visited German and Egyptian websites in using interactive features List of figures
  • Figure 2-1. The relationship among the sections of the present study’s theoretical background
  • Figure 2-2. The elements of the uses and gratifications basic model (McQuail & Windahl, 1997, p.134)
  • Figure 2-3. Rosengren’s paradigm for uses and gratifications (Rosengren, 1974, p.271)
  • Figure 2-4. Expectancy-value model of GS and GO (Rayburn & Palmgreen 1984, p.540)
  • Figure 2-5. A model of ‘cultural’ media use (McQuail & Windahl, 1997, p. 139)
  • Figure 2-6. The typology of audience activity (Levy& Windahl, 1984, p.54)
  • Rayburn, 1980, p. 165) Figure 2-7. The relation between gratifications sought and gratification obtained (Palmgreen, Wenner &
  • continuum” (1986: p.34) Figure 2-8. Rogers’ 1-dimensional Scale of “selected communication technologies on interactivity
  • Figure 2-9. Rafaeli’s 1-dimensional concept of interactivity (Rafaeli, 1988, p.120)
  • Figure 2-10. Interactive multimedia information flows (Szuprowicz, 1995, p.15)
  • Figure 2-11. Operationalization of interactivity (Kiousis, 2002, p 378).....................................................
  • Figure 2-12. Interactivity of interpersonal communication
  • Figure 2-13. Interactivity of mass communication (Hoffman, Novak & Chatterjee, 1995)
  • Figure 2-14. Interactivity of CMC (Hoffman, Novak & Chatterjee, 1995)
  • Figure 2-15. Four models of user-to-user interactivity (McMillan, 2002. p. 276)
  • Jee, 2003, p.118)......................................................................................................................................... Figure 2-16. Types of interactivity according to periods of communication process (Sohn, Leckenby &
  • Figure 2-17. Relationship between CMC and online communication
  • Figure 2-18. Online advertising revenue (2003-2008) From IAB,
  • Figure 2-19. Categorization of advertising (Janoschka, 2004, p.16)
  • Figure 2-20. Classification of web ads (Janoschka, 2004, p.49)
  • Figure 2-21. Static web ads
  • Figure 2-22. Animated advertisement
  • Figure 2-23. Interactive advertisement
  • Figure 2-24. The sizes of banner and button
  • Figure 2-25. Sponsorship...........................................................................................................................
  • Figure 2-26. Interstitial
  • Figure 2-27. Pop up
  • Figure 2-28. Rich media ads
  • Figure 2-29. Keyword search
  • Figure 2-30. Classifieds
  • Figure 2-31. Two samples of online advergames
  • Figure 2-32. Number of German and Egyptian users (Internet World States, 2009)
  • Figure 3-1. Elements essential to effective online advertising (Davis, 1999, p. 82)...................................
  • Figure 3-2. The interactive advertising model (IAM) (Rodgers & Thorson, 2000)
  • Figure 3-3. Suggested uses and gratifications model of online advertising and commercial websites
  • commercial websites Figure 5-1. The comparison between German and Egyptian users’ interaction with individual ads on
  • websites Figure 5-2. The comparison between German and Egyptian users’ purchasing online from commercial
  • Figure 5-3. Uses and gratifications model of commercial websites
  • Figure 5-4. The sample of the commercial websites based on the users (Egyptian or German)
  • Figure 5-5. The languages that are presented on German and Egyptian commercial websites
  • Figure 5-6. The types of commercial websites that were visited by German and Egyptian users
  • Figure 5-7. Individual ads on commercial websites that were visited by German and Egyptian users
  • Figure 5-8. Basic and contact information of visited commercial websites
  • and contact information Figure 5-9. Comparison between German and Egyptian visited commercial sites in presenting the basic
  • Figure 5-10. Interactive features of visited commercial websites
  • Figure 5-12. Formats of visited commercial websites
  • Figure 5-13. Features of visited commercial websites

XIX

Table 5-31. T-test significant comparisons between visited German and Egyptian websites in using interactive features ................................................................................................................................... 145 Table 5-32. ANOVA significant comparisons between commercial websites' use of basic and contact information based on the language of the site .......................................................................................... 147 Table 5-33. Bonferroni Post Hoc analysis of commercial websites' use of interactive features based on the language of the sites ................................................................................................................................. 148 Table 5-34. ANOVA significant comparisons between commercial websites' uses of interactive features based on the language of the site .............................................................................................................. 149 Table 5-35. Bonferroni Post Hoc analysis of commercial websites' use of interactive features based on the types of the sites ....................................................................................................................................... 150 Table 5-36. Bonferroni Post Hoc analysis of sponsorships ads on visited commercial websites based on the types of the sites ................................................................................................................................. 152 Table 5-37. T-test significant comparisons of the ads features used on commercial websites based on the type of advertisers of these ads ................................................................................................................. 153 Table 5-38. Bonferroni Post Hoc analysis of animations ads on visited commercial websites based on the types of the sites ....................................................................................................................................... 154

XX

Abbreviations and Acronyms

CCTLD: The country code top level domain

CMC: Computer-Mediated Communication

E-Mail : Electronic Mail

FAQs Frequently asked questions

FTF: Face to Face Communication

FTP: File Transfer Protocol

GO: Gratifications Obtained

GS: Gratifications Sought (Motives)

HDTV: High definition television

IAB: Interactive Advertising Bureau

IAM: Interactive Advertising Model

Internet: International Net

IRC: Internet Relay Chat

IT: Information Technology

IWS: Internet World States.

MUDs : Multi-User Dungeons

SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

VCRs: Video Cassette Recorder

WWW: World Wide Web.