





Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Biology test assignment last year 2023 with good grades and good original data
Typology: Assignments
1 / 9
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Hafsa Azhar Professor Lynn Hughey Engelbert PHIL 152 21 MAY 2023 Why We Crave Horror Movies By Stephen King The goals and purpose of Stephen King's essay "Why We Crave Horror Movies" is to explore and explain the reasons behind our fascination with horror movies, shedding light on the psychological and emotional aspects that drive individuals to seek out and enjoy such films. In this essay, I aim to examine the significance of fear extinction and its impact on individuals, drawing connections to the research conducted by other authors. To achieve this goal, the essay is organized into three main sections: introduction, analysis of reasons, and conclusion. In the introduction, I will captivate the reader's attention by introducing the topic of why people crave horror movies, referencing Stephen King's influential essay, and presenting the main thesis. The analysis of reasons section will delve into various motivations, such as seeking thrill and excitement, confronting fears, maintaining a sense of normalcy, and indulging in darker emotions and fantasies. Each reason will be supported by relevant evidence and examples. Finally, the conclusion will provide a concise summary of the main points discussed, restate the thesis, and underscore the importance of understanding our fascination with horror movies. INTRODUCTION After carefully examining Stephen King's essay titled "Why We Crave Horror Movies," it becomes evident that he delves into the underlying motivations behind our fascination with the horror genre.In his argument, King suggests that every individual possesses a certain degree of hidden madness, which is characterized by behaviors such as self-talk and irrational fears. According to King, attending horror movies allows us to confront and challenge our fears, serving as a testament to our courage. Furthermore, he posits that horror films play a role in reaffirming our sense of normalcy by showcasing extreme ugliness that stands in stark contrast to our own lives. Interestingly, the enjoyment derived from horror movies stems from witnessing the menace and sometimes the demise of others, akin to a contemporary form of public lynching. King also suggests that these films provide an opportunity for individuals to temporarily let go of their rationality and embrace simplicity, irrationality, and darkness. In this way, horror movies offer a controlled outlet for the shared insanity that exists within all of us. Presenting Topic In a society that frequently promotes positive emotions and adherence to societal norms, horror movies offer a unique opportunity to delve into our concealed fears and confront the darker corners of our psyche. Stephen King's examination of our attraction to horror movies prompts us to ponder the intricate interplay between our yearning for excitement, the preservation of normality, and our inherent fascination with the sinister. By comprehending these motivations, we can gain valuable insight into the complex relationship between horror films and our own human nature.
It explores the psychological appeal of the genre and our fascination with fear. Stephen King's analysis provides insights into our hidden fears, the desire for excitement, and the exploration of our darker psyche. It delves into the interplay between our need for normality and our attraction to the macabre. Understanding this context sheds light on the complex relationship between horror films and human nature. One of the primary reasons for our fascination with horror movies is the exhilarate and intense experience they provide. These films skillfully build suspense, tension, and fear, triggering a physiological response within us. From the anticipation of jump scares to the eerie atmosphere created by cinematography and soundtracks, horror movies immerse us in a heightened state of arousal. This allows us to step outside our comfort zones and engage with a controlled sense of danger and excitement. As a result, we find a unique form of entertainment that offers a temporary escape from our everyday lives. Furthermore, horror movies serve as a platform for cathartic release. By bravely confronting our deepest fears and anxieties in a safe and regulated environment, we experience a profound sense of relief and satisfaction. This emotional release can be therapeutic, empowering us with a renewed sense of psychological well-being. Through the narrative and visual elements of horror films, we are able to address and process our repressed emotions in a controlled manner. In essence, the allure of horror movies lies in their ability to create a thrilling and immersive experience, allowing us to momentarily transcend reality while simultaneously confronting our fears. By combining the rush of excitement with the cathartic release of repressed emotions, these films offer a unique and captivating form of entertainment that speaks to our innate curiosity and desire for exploration. Recite The statement, "I think that we're all mentally ill; those of us outside the asylums only hide it a little better and maybe not all that much better, after all," suggests that mental instability is a common characteristic shared by all individuals, regardless of whether they are officially diagnosed or not. The universality of mental instability and urges us to reflect on our own experiences and behaviors. It encourages a broader understanding and acceptance of the complexities of human psychology, emphasizing that mental health is a continuum rather than a binary distinction. When individuals purchase tickets for a horror movie and take seats in the center of the tenth row, they are challenging themselves to confront their fears. This act serves various purposes, including demonstrating their bravery, showing that they are unafraid, and proving that they can handle the intense emotions elicited by such films. Although a well-crafted horror movie may still startle them, prompting screams similar to those experienced on a roller coaster with complete 360-degree turns or daring dives into a lake, it is primarily the domain of the young. As individuals reach middle age, their desire for hair-raising experiences like double twists and loops tends to wane.Watching horror movies reaffirms a sense of normality and conservatism.Horror movies are considered a peculiar form of fun. The fun comes from witnessing others being menaced or killed. There is a comparison drawn between horror movies and public lynchings, suggesting a fascination with violence. Fairy-tale horror films aim to simplify and strip away complexity, encouraging viewers to see the world in stark black and white.Watching horror movies allows us to temporarily abandon analytical thinking and tap into our childlike perceptions.Horror movies offer a rare opportunity to embrace simplicity, irrationality, and even madness, providing a form of psychic relief. The concept of sanity is relative, and it becomes a matter of degree. Extreme acts of insanity, such as murder, result in confinement, while milder forms of insanity are often overlooked. Engaging in harmless or eccentric behaviors may lead to social exclusion, even if they don't reach the level of criminality.The implication is that societal standards of sanity and insanity are subjective and influenced by the severity of one's actions.The argument presented suggests that horror movies provide an
in conversations accompanying yourself or reacting to invented sketches? Have you seen friends or kin appendages presenting unfamiliar habits or fears that may appear illogical to an outsider? How do these happenings strengthen the plan that skilled is a certain level of basic insanity inside all things?Secondly, what are your thoughts on Stephen King's debate that fear pictures provide a sense of purification and admit us to investigate our hidden impulses in a reserved atmosphere? Can you relate to this perspective established your own happening accompanying fear movies or different forms of pleasure? Have you seen that vigilant horror flicks induces a range of sentiments, such as fear, enthusiasm, and a sense of remedy? Do you trust that these films offer a valuable release for our suppressed concerns and support an space for self-analysis into the darker aspects of human nature? Counterargument and Response In counterargument 1, horror movies desensitize us to violence and can contribute to real-life aggression. But this counterargument suggests that exposure to violent content in horror movies can have negative effects on individuals, such as desensitization and increased aggression. While there is some research indicating a desensitizing effect of media violence, it is important to note that individuals can differentiate between fiction and reality. The counterargument does not consider the role of personal responsibility and critical engagement with media. It also overlooks the fact that horror movies can serve as a cathartic release of emotions rather than fueling aggressive behavior. In counterargument 2, The horror movies perpetuate harmful stereotypes and cliches, particularly regarding gender and race. This counterargument highlights the issue of stereotypes and cliches present in certain horror movies.It raises a valid concern about the representation of diverse groups in horror movies. However, it fails to acknowledge that the genre has evolved, and many modern horror movies challenge and subvert these stereotypes. It is crucial to distinguish between movies that reinforce negative portrayals and those that provide progressive representations. Engaging with the genre critically allows viewers to discern between problematic and inclusive content. The counterargument 3, Horror movies can be psychologically harmful and contribute to anxiety or trauma.This counterargument suggests that horror movies can have detrimental effects on mental well-being, causing anxiety or trauma. While it is true that horror movies can evoke fear and discomfort, the impact varies among individuals. Many people actively seek out these experiences as a form of controlled excitement and adrenaline. It is essential to recognize personal boundaries and preferences. Additionally, responsible consumption and self-care can mitigate potential negative effects. In counterargument 4, there are alternative ways to explore and understand our darker emotions and primal instincts without resorting to horror movies. This counterargument asserts that there are alternative means of exploring darker emotions and instincts without relying on horror movies. While it is true that there are various avenues for self-reflection and emotional exploration, it is important to respect individual preferences and acknowledge that different mediums resonate with different people.The argument does not recognize the unique immersive and audiovisual nature of horror movies, which can provide a distinct emotional experience for some individuals. Author Purpose In his essay "Why We Crave Horror Movies," Stephen King achieves his purpose by giving a exciting and thought-provoking investigation of the human charm accompanying fear films. He starts by suggesting that all has a scope of mental illness, and fear motion pictures admit us to challenge our fears and anxieties in a regulated and dependable surroundings. King argues that vigilant fear flicks serves differing purposes. It admits us to show boldness and fearlessness, particularly beyond remainder of something. It again specifies a sense of sanity and help by emphasizing the bare contrast between the fictitious horrors on screen and our own lives. Assumption of Author
The author adopts that fear motion pictures symbolize a form of escapism and purification, contribution a temporary release for our ominous concerns and desires. He implies that these films tap into our inherited curiosity about the eerie and the grim aspects of human nature. King discusses that fear cinema strip away the complicated and moral ambiguities of absolute history, admitting us to occurrence a streamlined globe of good versus evil. He indicates that by taking care of in fear films, we temporarily surrender to unreasonable and insanity, that are rarely satisfactory in polished people.Another arrogance latent interpretation is that there is a joint "foolishness of he." King supposes that inside each of us lies a potential for intensity or satanic impulses, that sometimes need an release. He implies that institution accepts and even strengthens sure emotions, in the way that love and generosity, but skilled is a need for irregular verbalization of "anti-civilization passion." He disputes that horror cinema fulfill this need by providing an path to investigate and exercise these grim sentiments in a reserved and harmless method. Logical reasoning and Critical analysis The evidence presented by the author in "Why We Crave Horror Movies" provides a thought-provoking exploration of the psychological and societal aspects of the horror movie genre. The author offers personal observations and insights into the reasons behind our fascination with horror films, emphasizing themes such as the testing of courage, the affirmation of normality, and the release of repressed emotions. These points are bolstered by examples and comparisons to other forms of entertainment like amusement park rides and sports. However, it is important to note that the arguments presented by the author are subjective and based on personal opinions and observations rather than empirical evidence. The author's viewpoints are conveyed in a conversational and persuasive manner, which may resonate with readers on an emotional level but may not necessarily satisfy those seeking a more empirical or objective analysis. Moreover, the counterargument regarding stereotypes and cliches in horror movies raises a valid concern about the potential adverse effects of perpetuating biases and preconceptions through the genre. While the author's main arguments focus on the psychological facets of horror movies, the counterargument underscores the need for critical examination of the societal and cultural implications associated with the genre. Central Argument Our allure with fear cinema stems from our innate desire to challenge our fears, inquire thrilling occurrences, and investigate the darker corners of our personality in a controlled and purging conduct. Conclusion Stephen King presents captivating insights into the allure of horror movies and their psychological impact, the evidence provided is largely anecdotal and subjective. It is crucial to approach the arguments with a critical mindset and consider alternative viewpoints and empirical research to form a comprehensive assessment of the topic. Outline 1 The author's essay delves into the reasons behind our obsession accompanying fear movies. He contends that fear features supply a plank for us to survey our hidden foolishness and challenge our fears. Additionally, they augment our sense of sanity by placing side by side extreme ugliness accompanying advantage. Despite the dubious type of savoring the menace and violence described in these films, me plans that they offer a regulated release for our primeval emotions. In essence, fear pictures comprise a method for us to exercise and assert our emotional happiness.
survey the cognitive, affecting, and societal aspects behind our allure to fear flicks, shedding arrive the fundamental reasons for our yearning for such experiences. Outline 2 Introduction In his essay "Why We Crave Horror Movies," Stephen King investigate the attraction and appeal of fear features. This detracting review aims to judge the influence of King's debates and their pertinence to readers. Summary of the Essay King desires that basic emotional disorder lives inside all, asserting, "I think that we’re all mentally ill; those of us outside the asylums only hide it a little better" (King). He further argues that fear pictures specify an event to challenge fears and reveal boldness, as he states, "When we pay our four or five bucks and seat ourselves at tenth-row center in a theater showing a horror movie, we are daring the nightmare" (King). According to King, individual reason we are tense to fear features is the occurrence of incitement and excitement, that he likens to dominating a swell platter. He defines, "To show that we can, that we are not afraid, that we can ride this roller coaster" (King). Moreover, King argues that fear shows refurbish a sense of mediocrity by stressing the boundless dissimilarity in confidence and valid. He states, "The horror movie is innately conservative, even reactionary... we are still light-years from true ugliness" (King). Evaluation of Arguments King's view on hereditary emotional disorder inflames understanding and invites readers to degrade their own knowledge (King). The test of fear films by way of facing fears and trying boldness raises appealing questions about human medicine and inspirations (King). The comparison of fear film occurrences to dominating a swell platter offers intuitiveness into the appeal and possession of these films (King). Similarly, the debate that fear flicks augment a sense of mediocrity by emphasize the contrast in confidence and valid displeasing specifies a irresistible view (King). In my critical review of Stephen King's essay, I find his exploration of the appeal of fear movies through the glass of hereditary emotional disorder and fear conflict expected specifically meaningful. His assertion that "we’re all mentally ill; those of us outside the asylums only conceal it to some extent better" (King) sheds arrive the fundamental human personality and prompts further evaluation. By requesting various flags of judgment, containing clearness, control, depth, pertinence, agreement, and impact, I aim to specify a inclusive reasoning of the substances and defect of King's arguments. I will evaluate the probable performance, designation support, and the influence of welcome interpretation in connecting emotional disorder accompanying the interest to fear cinema. Additionally, I will try the extent at which point King survey the emotional and touching facets of fear picture viewership, as well as the fuller relevance of welcome debates to human practice and societal influences. I will judge the organization and agreement of the essay, considering the flow of plans and the makeup's support for the presented debates. Finally, I will resolve the engagement and impact of King's essay style and debates, directing on their capability to capture the reader's consideration, stimulate fault-finding thinking, and leave a enduring feeling. Through this inclusive judgment, I aim to support a all-encompassing assessment of the meaning of King's debates in understanding the appeal of fear films and their intellectual associations (King). Rough Draft Stephen King's exploration of the appeal of horror movies through the lens of basic mental illness and fear conflict in his thought-provoking essay is particularly meaningful. He argues that deep down, we all possess a level of emotional disorder, stating, "I believe we're all mentally ill; those of us outside the asylums just hide it
better" (King). This assertion sheds light on the fundamental aspects of human nature and invites further examination. King suggests that horror films serve as a means for individuals to confront their fears and test their courage. By willingly subjecting ourselves to the terrifying scenarios portrayed on screen, we demonstrate our ability to face adversity. King refers to it as "daring the nightmare," a challenge to prove that we are not easily frightened (King). This aspect of horror movies adds an element of excitement and thrill, akin to riding a roller coaster. Another aspect King discusses is the notion that horror films allow us to restore our sense of ordinary existence. He argues that these movies are inherently conservative and reactionary, as they highlight our distance from real horrors. By witnessing the unnatural and horrifying, such as the grotesque transformation of a character in a film like "Die, Monster, Die!," we are reminded that we are far removed from such abominations (King). This reaffirmation of sanity provides a sense of comfort and reassurance to the viewers. However, King acknowledges the darker side of the gratification derived from horror movies. He posits that part of the enjoyment stems from witnessing the suffering and sometimes the demise of others on screen. He draws a parallel between horror movies and the historical practice of public lynching, suggesting that horror films have become the modern equivalent of secretly watching others' struggles (King). This highlights the unsettling aspect of our attraction to horror, where we find pleasure in the pain and fate of fictional characters. King argues that horror films entice us to momentarily abandon our polished and rational selves and instead engage with madness, irrationality, and even complete insanity. He suggests that horror movies offer a cathartic release by allowing our empathy to roam free, unbound by social norms or realistic constraints. In a world where such invitations to embrace madness are rare, horror films provide a unique outlet for the expression of our primal and irrational impulses (King). In evaluating the merits of King's arguments, several criteria can be considered. Firstly, the clarity of his arguments in linking basic emotional disorder to the allure of horror cinema should be examined. Are his points logically presented and supported by sufficient evidence? Secondly, the persuasiveness of his arguments needs to be evaluated. Does he effectively convince readers of his viewpoints through compelling evidence and interpretation? Furthermore, the depth of King's exploration into the psychological and emotional aspects of horror movie viewership should be assessed. Does he provide a comprehensive analysis of the motivations and reactions of viewers? Additionally, the relevance and applicability of his arguments to the realm of horror movies should be considered. Do his insights shed light on broader human behavior, fears, and societal influences? The coherence and structure of King's essay should also be examined. How well do his ideas flow, and does the structure support the presented arguments? Lastly, the impact and effectiveness of King's writing style and arguments should be judged. Do they effectively capture the reader's attention, stimulate critical thinking, and leave a lasting impression? By employing these evaluation criteria, a comprehensive analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of King's essay can be undertaken. This assessment enables a deeper understanding of his arguments and their implications in unraveling the appeal of horror movies and their psychological significance. In conclusion, Stephen King's exploration of the appeal of horror films in his essay offers valuable insights into the human psyche and our fascination with fear
. His examination of inherent madness and fear invites contemplation on the complexities of human nature and our attraction to the horror genre.