

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The reasons behind the different shapes of bacteria, focusing on rods (bacilli) and spheres (cocci). The text suggests that these shapes confer various advantages, such as streamlined bodies for swimming and larger surface areas for nutrient intake. However, spherical shapes may also evolve in environments with high desiccation or osmotic shock risks.
What you will learn
Typology: Study notes
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
! Why Rods and Cocci
Bacteria exhibit a wide variety of shapes but the commonly studied species of bacteria are generally either spherical in shape which are called cocci (singular coccus) or have a cylindrical shape and are called rods or bacilli (singular bacillus). In reality rods and cocci are the ends of a continuum. Sonle of the cocci are slightly elongated and some of the rods are so short that they look almost like cocci. Sometimes a term coccobacillus is used to describe them.
Why did bacteria get different shapes? Why aren't all of them spherical or all rod shaped? Different shapes are likely to give different selective advantages. A rod shaped cell has a streamlined body which would be advantageous in swimming, just like the slender body of a fish, a boat or a plane. A spherical body will experience greater frictional resistance. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that among the flagellated motile bacteria almost all are rod shaped. Only exceptionally few cocci are motile. This hypothesis, however, is not adequate since a large number of species of bacteria are non-motile.
A rod shape can confer another advantage, that of having a large surface area per unit volume. Intake of nutrients takes place through the cell surface. The rate of bacterial growth depends largely on the rate of intake of nutrients. Therefore having a large surface area can confer great selective advantage whenever there is competition for nutrients.
The obvious question that follows is that if a rod shape confers many advantages, then why did spherical cells evolve at all? Among all possible shapes, a sphere has the minimum ·surface area per unit volume. Having a larger surface area might be good for intake of nutrients, but it may prove detrimental under some other conditions such as desiccation or osmotic shocks. If a cell
Milind Watve M.E. Society, Abasaheb Garware College, Karve Road Pune 411 004, India.
is exposed to desiccation or to a hypertonic environment, it will lose water through its surface. Bacteria have mechanisms to resist desiccation. However, more the surface area more difficult will it be to resist desiccation. In environments where osmotic shocks or desiccation is likely to be faced more frequently, a spherical shape is more likely to evolve.
These are speculations, and mere speculations don't make science. The speculations should lead to testable predictions, which should be tested through observations or experiments. The tests may either reject or support a hypothesis. We can make the following testable predictions from the speculations we have made.
a. Bacteria with the fastest growth rates should be rod shaped and not cocci, since greater rate of nutrient uptake will allow faster growth.
b. In environments such as perennial fresh water lakes or the inside of the gut of animals, where osmotic conditions are fairly constant, one should find a greater proportion of rods as compared to environments such as soil where large osmotic fluctuations and prolonged periods of desiccation are common.
c. Since rod shaped organisms are more susceptible to desiccation, they may need additional sophisticated mechanisms of resistance such as spore formation. The prediction of the hypothesis is that rod shaped bacteria should show a greater proportion of spore formers than cocci.
d. Clustering of cells reduces the surface exposed to the environ- ment. Rod shaped cells should not show a tendency to form clusters since clustering will defeat the purpose of being rod shaped while cocci should show profound tendencies of clustering in all dimensions since it further reduces the surface area.