Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Working-Class Sexuality in New York City, 1880-1920, Summaries of History

A summary of Kathy Peiss' article 'Charity Girls' and City Pleasures', which explores the history of working-class sexuality in New York City during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Peiss examines the concept of 'chastity' as a measure of respectability for young women and the socio-economic environments of the middle and working classes. The article provides historical insights into the ways in which class, gender, and sexuality intersected and were regulated in this time period.

Typology: Summaries

2022/2023

Available from 06/04/2023

maria.loudyi
maria.loudyi 🇺🇸

12 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Kathy Peiss,
“’Charity Girls’ and City Pleasures: Historical Notes on Working-Class Sexuality, 1880-
1920” Summary
In “Charity Girls’ and City Pleasures”, the historian Kathy Peiss focuses on bringing to light the
history of working-class sexuality in New York City during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
During this time, prostitution and working-class sexuality became subjects of public scrutiny and
concern. Peiss refers to journalists’ and reformers’ pieces which illustrate middle class’
perspectives and argues that although working-class women did not meet middle class’
standards, they were not necessarily promiscuous. However, the concept of "chastity" was used
as a measure of respectability for young women, and those who engaged in premarital
intercourse or were perceived to have were considered promiscuous.1This gave rise to the term
“charity girls” which alludes to women who did not accept money in their sexual encounters
with men2. Peiss also enlightens the socio-economic environments of the middle and working
classes. While the middle-class was sex-segregated, with women confined to the household, the
working-class worked in mixed environments where privacy was often lacking: “many factories
lacked privacy in dressing facilities, and workers tolerated a degree of familiarity and
roughhousing between men and women.”3 In fact, Peiss’ article provides historical insights into
the ways in which class, gender, and sexuality intersected and were regulated in this time period.
Her work clarifies the complexities and contradictions of working-class sexuality during a time
of great social change and upheaval in the United States.
1 Kathy Peiss, “Charity Girls’ and City Pleasures: Historical Notes on Working-Class Sexuality, 1880-1920”, 75.
2 Peiss, “Charity Girls’ and City Pleasures”, 81.
3 Peiss, “Charity Girls’ and City Pleasures”, 79.

Partial preview of the text

Download Working-Class Sexuality in New York City, 1880-1920 and more Summaries History in PDF only on Docsity!

Kathy Peiss, “’Charity Girls’ and City Pleasures: Historical Notes on Working-Class Sexuality, 1880- 1920” Summary In “Charity Girls’ and City Pleasures”, the historian Kathy Peiss focuses on bringing to light the history of working-class sexuality in New York City during the late 19th^ and early 20th^ centuries. During this time, prostitution and working-class sexuality became subjects of public scrutiny and concern. Peiss refers to journalists’ and reformers’ pieces which illustrate middle class’ perspectives and argues that although working-class women did not meet middle class’ standards, they were not necessarily promiscuous. However, the concept of "chastity" was used as a measure of respectability for young women, and those who engaged in premarital intercourse or were perceived to have were considered promiscuous.^1 This gave rise to the term “charity girls” which alludes to women who did not accept money in their sexual encounters with men^2. Peiss also enlightens the socio-economic environments of the middle and working classes. While the middle-class was sex-segregated, with women confined to the household, the working-class worked in mixed environments where privacy was often lacking: “many factories lacked privacy in dressing facilities, and workers tolerated a degree of familiarity and roughhousing between men and women.”^3 In fact, Peiss’ article provides historical insights into the ways in which class, gender, and sexuality intersected and were regulated in this time period. Her work clarifies the complexities and contradictions of working-class sexuality during a time of great social change and upheaval in the United States. (^1) Kathy Peiss, “Charity Girls’ and City Pleasures: Historical Notes on Working-Class Sexuality, 1880-1920”, 75. (^2) Peiss, “Charity Girls’ and City Pleasures”, 81. (^3) Peiss, “Charity Girls’ and City Pleasures”, 79.