
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Material Type: Assignment; Class: Wr Sem:Femininity & Perceive; Subject: Interdepartmental; University: SUNY at Geneseo; Term: Unknown 1989;
Typology: Assignments
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
INTD 105-11: Writing Seminar: A Century of Science Fiction Dr. Pogo Writing Grade and Assessment Summary v. 6.
Follows Assignment 1 2 3 4 5 Grammar and Mechanical Clarity 1 2 3 4 5 Critical Reading 1 2 3 4 5 Argument 1 2 3 4 5 Logic and Coherence 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence 1 2 3 4 5 Directness and Succinctness 1 2 3 4 5 Revision 1 2 3 4 5
Most Common Problems:
£ The paper does not address the assignment given £ The paper has no significant thesis £ The thesis is trite £ The paper’s thesis is not obvious until too late in the paper £ The first paragraph is irrelevant or vague £ The first paragraph does not provide a sufficient summary of the arguments
£ There are many grammatical errors £ The paper has frequent misspellings £ There are frequent tense disagreements (past/present/future) £ There are many grammatically awkward sentences £ The paper uses “would” or “could” inappropriately £ Modifiers such as “very”, “many”, or “greatly” are used incorrectly £ There are too many passive sentences £ The paper awkwardly refers to “one” too often £ There are many incorrect word selections
£ The paper makes claims that are either untrue or unproven £ The paper cites facts without reference to their source £ The conclusion introduces new ideas
£ The revision contains no new concepts £ The revision fails to correct ALL typographical errors £ The paper was submitted improperly (e.g., by email, or with the wrong filename).
General Comments: